Trainee Perspectives Regarding the Effect of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Supreme Court Decision on Obstetrics and Gynecology Training.

Objectives: We aimed to describe obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) trainees' anticipation of how the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (Dobbs) U.S. Supreme Court decision may affect their training. Methods: A REDCap survey of OBGYN residents and fellows in the United States from September 19, 2022, to December 1, 2022, queried trainees' anticipated achievement of relevant Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) training milestones, their concerns about the ability to provide care and concern about legal repercussions during training, and the importance of OBGYN competence in managing certain clinical situations for residency graduates. The primary outcome was an ACGME program trainee feeling uncertain or unable to obtain the highest level queried for a relevant ACGME milestone, including experiencing 20 abortion procedures in residency. Results: We received 469 eligible responses; the primary outcome was endorsed by 157 respondents (33.5%). After correction for confounders, significant predictors of the primary outcome were state environment (aOR = 3.94 for pending abortion restrictions; aOR = 2.71 for current abortion restrictions), trainee type (aOR = 0.21 for fellow vs. resident), and a present or past Ryan Training Program in residency (aOR = 0.55). Although the vast majority of trainees believed managing relevant clinical situations are key to OBGYN competence, 10%-30% of trainees believed they would have to stop providing the standard of care in clinical situations during training. Conclusions: This survey of OBGYN trainees indicates higher uncertainty about achieving ACGME milestones and procedural competency in clinical situations potentially affected by the Dobbs decision in states with legal restrictions on abortion.

Patient Perspectives Following Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury.

IMPORTANCE: An obstetric anal sphincter injury can significantly affect patients. Support for these patients is both limited and not well understood. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe patient experiences after an obstetric anal sphincter injury. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective cross-sectional qualitative study of patients who experienced an obstetric anal sphincter injury within a tertiary care network between May and June of 2022. Demographic data, clinical data regarding the delivery, and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale were collected. Prospective semistructured interviews were conducted approximately 5-12 weeks postpartum to address opportunities to improve obstetric anal sphincter injury care. Qualitative analysis was performed using a grounded theory approach. RESULTS: Fifteen women with a mean age of 31 (±3.93) years participated. The majority identified as White (93.3%) and non-Hispanic (100%). All participants identified as being married to men and completing undergraduate education; 9 (60%) also received postgraduate education. Five participants (33.3%) screened positive (score of 10 or greater) for postnatal depression on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Thematic saturation was reached with 3 major themes identified: (1) pain control, (2) desire for multifactorial support, and (3) obstetric anal sphincter injury knowledge and awareness. CONCLUSIONS: Experiencing an obstetric anal sphincter injury represents a great unknown to most women. This study identifies opportunities for improved postpartum care through education, pain control, and patient support. Interventions are needed to improve the postpartum experience for women who experience an obstetric anal sphincter injury with childbirth.

Perineal lacerations and social media: can patients find reliable information on Instagram and TikTok?

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Social media content related to patient experiences and education continues to grow. Information on how obstetric perineal lacerations are represented on social media is limited. Our goal is to characterize available social media content on obstetric perineal lacerations. METHODS: This is an IRB-exempt study using publicly available data on commonly searched topics about perineal lacerations to create a list of queries for Instagram and TikTok. The ten queries and "keyword" searches with the highest number of posts were identified from this list. The 50 most recent posts were reviewed for relevance, quality of content, and authorship. Topic-relevant posts were analyzed. RESULTS: The search yielded 427 posts on Instagram and 500 on TikTok. Instagram yielded more topic-relevant posts than TikTok (94.1% vs 44.8%). Almost 50% of posts were categorized as educational. Instagram identified more patient experience-related posts (29.6%) whereas TikTok provided more humorous content (26.3%). Patients produced 27.6% of content on Instagram and 43.3% on TikTok. Physical therapists produced 18.9% of posts on Instagram and 21.9% on TikTok. They constituted the largest group of health professionals to post overall. Physician-created educational content accounted for 10.3% of posts on Instagram and 6.0% on TikTok. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with TikTok, Instagram may be a more informative social media platform for educational or patient experience-related content. Given the paucity of physician-created content and given that only half of all posts are educational, providers should encourage social media engagement for community and networking purposes, while encouraging caution with regard to cosmetic products and advertisements.

Outcomes in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse Presenting With Pessary-Related Complications.

IMPORTANCE: There is currently a paucity of data describing the outcomes of women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and/or urinary incontinence (UI) who present with pessary-related complications. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe outcomes in women with POP and UI managed with a pessary who present with pessary-related complications. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of women with POP and/or UI who elected for management with a pessary from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2020. Patients were included if they had used a pessary for at least 1 year and had a documented pessary-related complication. Complications were defined a priori, and patient charts were abstracted using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revisions codes associated with pessary use. RESULTS: Of 2,088 of women receiving pessary care, 444 (21%) experienced a complication. Of 154 of women, 34.6% experienced 2 pessary-related complications during the study period, whereas 12.6% (56) experienced 3, 4.5% (20) experienced 4, and 1.8% (8) experienced 5. One hundred fifty-two patients (34.2%) underwent surgery during the study period to manage their POP and/or UI. Patients who were older were less likely to have surgery (adjusted odds ratio, 0.70 [95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.90]; P = 0.002), and patients who had an indication of pessary use for both POP and UI were more likely to undergo surgery during the study period (adjusted odds ratio, 2.12 [95% confidence interval, 1.29-3.48]; P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that 1 in 5 patients has a documented complication associated with pessary use of greater than 1 year. Of these patients, one third will eventually undergo surgery for management of their POP and/or UI.

Restrictive opioid prescribing after surgery for prolapse and incontinence: a randomized, noninferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Opioids are routinely prescribed for postoperative pain control after gynecologic surgery with growing evidence showing that most prescribed opioids go unused. Restrictive opioid prescribing has been implemented in other surgical specialties to combat the risk for opioid misuse and diversion. The impact of this practice in the urogynecologic patient population is unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine if a restrictive opioid prescription protocol is noninferior to routine opioid prescribing in terms of patient satisfaction with pain control after minor and major surgeries for prolapse and incontinence. STUDY DESIGN: This was a single-center, randomized, noninferiority trial of opioid-naïve patients who underwent minor (eg, colporrhaphy or mid-urethral sling) or major (eg, vaginal or minimally invasive abdominal prolapse repair) urogynecologic surgery. Patients were excluded if they had contraindications to all multimodal analgesia and if they scored ≥30 on the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Subjects were randomized on the day of surgery to the standard opioid prescription protocol (wherein patients routinely received an opioid prescription upon discharge [ie, 3-10 tablets of 5 mg oxycodone]) or to the restrictive protocol (no opioid prescription unless the patient requested one). All patients received multimodal pain medications. Participants and caregivers were not blinded. Subjects were asked to record their pain medication use and pain levels for 7 days. The primary outcome was satisfaction with pain control reported at the 6-week postoperative visit. We hypothesized that patient satisfaction with the restrictive protocol would be noninferior to those randomized to the standard protocol. The noninferiority margin was 15 percentage points. Pain level scores, opioid usage, opioid prescription refills, and healthcare use were secondary outcomes assessed for superiority. RESULTS: A total of 133 patients were randomized, and 127 (64 in the standard arm and 63 in the restrictive arm) completed the primary outcome evaluation and were included in the analysis. There were no statistically significant differences between the study groups, and this remained after adjusting for the surgery type. Major urogynecologic surgery was performed in 73.6% of the study population, and minor surgery was performed in 26.4% of the population. Same-day discharge occurred for 87.6% of all subjects. Patient satisfaction was 92.2% in the standard protocol arm and 92.1% in the restrictive protocol arm (difference, -0.1%; P=.004), which met the criterion for noninferiority. No opioid usage in the first 7 days after hospital discharge was reported by 48.4% of the patients in the standard protocol arm and by 70.8% in the restrictive protocol arm (P=.009). Opioid prescription refills occurred in 8.5% of patients with no difference between the study groups (9.4% in the standard arm vs 6.7% in the restrictive arm; P=.661). No difference was seen in the rate of telephone calls and urgent visits for pain control between the study arms. CONCLUSION: Among women who underwent minor and major surgery for prolapse and incontinence, patient satisfaction rates were noninferior after restrictive opioid prescribing when compared with routine opioid prescribing.

Patient Outcomes After Robotic Ventral Rectopexy With Sacrocolpopexy.

IMPORTANCE: As few studies exist examining postoperative functional outcomes in patients undergoing robotic sacrocolpopexy and ventral rectopexy, results from this study can help guide surgeons in counseling patients on their outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate functional outcomes and overall postoperative satisfaction as measured by the Pelvic Floor Disability Index 20 (PFDI-20), Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12), and Patient Global Impression of Improvement Scale (PGI-I) in patients who underwent combined robotic ventral rectopexy and sacrocolpopexy for concomitant pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and rectal prolapse or intussusception (RP/I). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort and survey study of patients with combined POP and RP/I who underwent the previously mentioned surgical repair between January 2018 and July 2021. Each patient was contacted to participate in a survey evaluating postoperative symptoms related bother, sexual function, and overall satisfaction using the PFDI-20, PISQ-12, and PGI-I. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients met study inclusion criteria with 67 patients completing the surveys. The mean age and body mass index were 63.7 ± 11.5 years and 25.0 ± 5.4, respectively. Of the patients, 19% had a prior RP repair and 23% had a prior POP repair. Rectal prolapse or intussusception recurrence was reported in 10.4% of patients and objective POP recurrence was found in 7.5% of patients. Sixty-seven patients (62%) completed the surveys. The median time to survey follow-up was 18 (8.8-51.8) months. At the time of survey, the mean PFDI-20 score was 95.7 ± 53.7. The mean PISQ-12 score for all patients was 32.8 ± 7.2 and the median PGI-I score was 2.0 (interquartile range, 1.0-3.0). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of patients who underwent a combined robotic ventral rectopexy and sacrocolpopexy, patient-reported postoperative symptom bother was low, sexual function was high, and their overall condition was much improved.

Is there an association between 6-month genital hiatus size and 24-month composite prolapse recurrence following minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy?

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Although an enlarged postoperative genital hiatus (GH) size has been identified as a predictor of recurrence following pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery, the protective role of concurrent level III support procedures to reduce the GH size at the time of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (MI-SCP) remains unclear. The objective of this study was to compare 24-month composite prolapse recurrence following MI-SCP between patients with a 6-month postoperative GH measurement of <3 cm versus ≥3 cm; and to explore the impact of concurrent level III support procedures on prolapse recurrence, bowel, and sexual function. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of two randomized controlled trials of women who underwent MI-SCP from 2014 to 2020. Our primary outcome was composite prolapse recurrence defined as retreatment with either pessary or surgery, and/or subjective bothersome vaginal bulge. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated to identify a 6-month GH cutoff point associated with 24-month composite recurrence. RESULTS: Of the 108 women who met the inclusion criteria, 13 (12%) had composite prolapse recurrence at 24 months: 12 patients (11.1%) reported a bothersome vaginal bulge, and 3 patients (2.8%) underwent retreatment with surgery. A ROC curve demonstrated that a 6-month postoperative GH size of 3 cm had 84.6% sensitivity to predict vaginal bulge and/or retreatment at 24 months (area under curve = 0.52). There was no difference in the composite prolapse recurrence between the groups; however, only patients with a 6-month GH >3 cm underwent retreatment. CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-four-month composite prolapse recurrence does not differ based on 6-month GH size; however, surgical failure may be more common in those with a GH size greater than 3 cm.

Adherence to Perioperative Behavioral Therapy With Pelvic Floor Muscle Training in Women Receiving Vaginal Reconstructive Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe adherence to behavioral and pelvic floor muscle training in women undergoing vaginal reconstructive surgery for organ prolapse and to examine whether adherence was associated with 24-month outcomes. METHODS: Participants were women ≥18 years of age, with vaginal bulge and stress urinary incontinence symptoms, planning to undergo vaginal reconstructive surgery for stages 2 to 4 vaginal or uterine prolapse. They were randomized to either sacrospinous ligament fixation or uterosacral ligament suspension and to perioperative behavioral and pelvic floor muscle training or usual care. Measurements included anatomic failure, pelvic floor muscle strength, participant-reported symptoms, and perceived improvement. Analyses compared women with lower versus higher adherence. RESULTS: Forty-eight percent of women performed pelvic floor muscle exercises (PFMEs) daily at the 4- to 6-week visit. Only 33% performed the prescribed number of muscle contractions. At 8 weeks, 37% performed PFMEs daily, and 28% performed the prescribed number of contractions. No significant relationships were found between adherence and 24-month outcomes. CONCLUSION: Adherence to a behavioral intervention was low following vaginal reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. The degree of adherence to perioperative training did not appear to influence 24-month outcomes in women undergoing vaginal prolapse surgery. IMPACT: This study contributes to the understanding of participant adherence to PFMEs and the impact that participant adherence has on outcomes at 2, 4 to 6, 8, and 12 weeks and 24 months postoperatively. It is important to educate women to follow up with their therapist or physician to report new or unresolved pelvic symptoms.

Sexual Function in Women at 6 and 12 Months After Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury: Is Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy Associated With Improved Outcomes?

IMPORTANCE: Women with obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) are at increased risk of postpartum sexual dysfunction. Risk persists beyond 3 years after perineal trauma in up to half of patients with OASI. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to determine if postpartum pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) is associated with improved sexual function after vaginal delivery with OASI and to describe sexual function in patients with OASI at 6 and 12 months postpartum. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with OASI. Women were grouped according to PFPT attendance. The Postpartum Pelvic Floor and Birth Questionnaire (PPFBQ), which compares current sexual function to baseline prepregnancy sexual function, and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) were administered at 6 and 12 months, respectively, to evaluate postpartum sexual function. RESULTS: Two hundred women were included. Sixty-four (32%) women attended PFPT; 136 (68%) did not attend PFPT. Patients reported worse-than-baseline sexual function at 6 months postpartum in the PPFBQ sexual activity domain, but the PFPT group had lower median score than the non-PFPT group (2.3 [2.0, 2.8] vs 2.7 [2.1, 3.1], P = 0.034), with scores <3.0 indicating worse-than-baseline functioning. The FSFI composite scores were similar between groups and showed 80.7% of the patients with OASI meeting the criteria for female sexual dysfunction at 12 months postpartum. Attendance of PFPT was not significantly associated with composite FSFI scores and most domains of PPFBQ. CONCLUSIONS: Attendance of PFPT did not significantly impact overall sexual function in OASI patients at 6 and 12 months postpartum. Sexual function is complex and may be more effectively addressed in the postpartum period using a multidimensional approach.

Changes in sexual function over 12 months after native-tissue vaginal pelvic organ prolapse surgery with and without hysterectomy.

Background: There is a need to determine how preoperative sexual activity, uterine preservation, and hysterectomy affect sexual function after pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Aim: (1) To determine changes in sexual function in women, stratified by preoperative sexual activity status, after native-tissue pelvic organ prolapse surgery. (2) To examine the impact of hysterectomy and uterine preservation on sexual function. (3) To determine predictors for postoperative dyspareunia. Methods: This was a planned secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study. Sexual function was evaluated preoperatively and 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Sexual function was compared between those who had a hysterectomy and those who had uterine-preserving prolapse surgery. A logistic regression analysis was performed to assess predictors for dyspareunia. Outcomes: Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire. Results: At 12 months, 59 patients underwent surgery and were followed up (hysterectomy [n = 28, 47.5%] vs no hysterectomy [n = 31, 52.5%]; sexually active [n = 26, 44.1%] vs non-sexually active [n = 33, 55.9%]). Of those who did not undergo a hysterectomy, 17 (54.8%) had a uterine-preserving procedure. At 12 months, sexually active patients had significant improvement in sexual function (mean ± SD, 0.37 ± 0.43; P = .005), while non-sexually active patients reported significant improvement in satisfaction of sex life (P = .04) and not feeling sexually inferior (P = .003) or angry (P = .03) because of prolapse. No variables were associated with dyspareunia on bivariate analysis. Clinical Implications: It did not appear that either uterine preservation or hysterectomy had any impact on sexual function. There was a 10% increase in people who were sexually active after surgery. Strengths and Limitations: The major strength of our study is the use of a condition-specific validated questionnaire intended for sexually active and non-sexually active women. We interpreted our results utilizing a validated minimal clinically important difference score to provide interpretation of our results with statistical and clinical significance. The limitation of our study is that it was a secondary analysis that was not powered for these specific outcomes. Conclusion: At 12 months, for patients who were sexually active preoperatively, there was a clinically meaningful improvement in sexual function after native-tissue pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Non-sexually active women reported improvement in satisfaction of sex life. There was no difference in the sexual function of patients undergoing uterine preservation or posthysterectomy colpopexy when compared with those with concurrent hysterectomy, though this sample size was small.

Fecal Microbiota Transfer for Clostridium difficile Infection and Its Effects on Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection.

IMPORTANCE: Recurrent urinary tract infection (rUTI) poses a significant management challenge, and fecal microbiota transfer (FMT) has been shown in a limited manner to positively effect rUTI. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare UTI rates after FMT for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in patients with previously diagnosed rUTI and patients without a previous diagnosis of rUTI. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of female patients who underwent FMT between 2015 and 2020 and were identified from a database at a tertiary care referral center. The electronic medical record was queried for demographic and UTI characteristics in the 3 years before and 5 years after FMT, which were compared between patients with or without a preexisting history of rUTI. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five patients were included, 17 of whom had a preexisting history of rUTI. The median number of culture-proven UTIs was 1 in the rUTI group versus 0 in the non-rUTI group both in the 1 year ( P = 0.003) and 3 years ( P < 0.001) before FMT. Most UTIs before and after FMT were Escherichia coli UTIs (53.8%) and carried some antibiotic resistance (54.6%). Comparatively, in the year after FMT, there were no differences between groups in UTI frequency or antibiotic administration (0 [0-1] vs 0.5 [0-1], P = 0.28). A trend toward decreased frequency of UTI in the 1 year after FMT was seen in the rUTI group. On survival analysis, there was a nonsignificant decrease in the 3-year UTI-free rate for the rUTI group compared with the non-rUTI group (76.5% vs 90.1%, P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with recurrent UTI undergoing FMT for recurrent CDI experienced a trend toward a decrease in frequency of UTI after FMT.

The Impact of Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy on Bladder and Bowel Function After Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury.

IMPORTANCE: Women with obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) are at increased risk of pelvic floor disorders. No standard of care exists for management of pelvic floor dysfunction after OASI. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to evaluate the impact of pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) on bladder and bowel function after OASI and to describe adherence to PFPT. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of women with OASI presenting at a postpartum care clinic from 2017 to 2021 was conducted. Women were grouped according to PFPT attendance. Urinary Distress Inventory 6 (UDI-6) and Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI) were administered at baseline and 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 430 women with OASI presented to a postpartum care clinic, of which 137 (31.9%) attended PFPT, and 293 (68.1%) did not attend. Baseline and 6-month questionnaires were completed by 169 women: 52 (30.8%) in the PFPT group and 117 (69.2%) in the non-PFPT group. Baseline UDI-6 and FISI scores were higher in the PFPT group. Improvement in UDI-6 was not different between groups (-5.8 ± 14.9 vs -3.7 ± 10.8, P = 0.36). The non-PFPT group had greater worsening of FISI compared with PFPT group (9.8 ± 15.2 vs 1.1 ± 11.5, P < 0.001). Sixty-six percent (n = 136) of women referred to PFFT attended at least 1 session, of which 32.4% (n = 44) completed all sessions. Completely adherent women were referred to PFPT earlier (18.5 vs 28.5 days postpartum, P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Women in both the PFPT and non-PFPT groups reported improvement in bladder leakage 6 months after OASI. Women who did not attend PFPT had significant worsening of bowel leakage. Early referral to PFPT in women with pelvic floor dysfunction following OASI should be considered.

Impact of peripartum antibiotics on wound complications in women with obstetric anal sphincter injury.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of antibiotics on preventing wound complications following obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI). METHODS: This is a cohort study with retrospective and prospective components of women who sustained an OASI at vaginal delivery. The primary objective of this study was to assess the impact of prophylactic antibiotics at the time of delivery on perineal wound complications. Women were grouped based on peripartum antibiotic administration: no antibiotics (NABX), antibiotics for OASI wound complication prophylaxis (PABX), antibiotics for therapeutic indications (TABX), and antibiotics for any indication (AABX, PABX + TABX). RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty-five women with OASI were included in this analysis. Most women experienced a third-degree perineal laceration (358, 84.2%). One hundred and sixteen (27.3%) women received NABX, 195 (45.9%) women received PABX, and 114 (26.8%) women received TABX. Cefazolin was the most common antibiotic in the PABX group. Perineal wound complications occurred in 51 (12.0%) women: 14 (12.4%) in NABX, 26 (13.3%) in PABX, 11 (9.6%) in TABX, and 37 (12.0%) in AABX. The incidence of perineal wound complications did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort study, peripartum antibiotics did not reduce wound complication incidence following OASI. It is likely that a first-generation cephalosporin is not the ideal antibiotic in this clinical setting.

Postpartum urinary retention: an expert review.

Postpartum urinary retention is a relatively common condition that can have a marked impact on women in the immediate days following childbirth. If left untreated, postpartum urinary retention can lead to repetitive overdistention injury that may damage the detrusor muscle and the parasympathetic nerve fibers within the bladder wall. In rare circumstances, postpartum urinary retention may even lead to bladder rupture, which is a potentially life-threatening yet entirely preventable complication. Early diagnosis and timely intervention are necessary to decrease long-term consequences. There are 3 types of postpartum urinary retention: overt, covert, and persistent. Overt retention is associated with an inability to void, whereas covert retention is associated with incomplete bladder emptying. Persistent urinary retention continues beyond the third postpartum day and can persist for several weeks in rare cases. Recognition of risk factors and prompt diagnosis are important for proper management and prevention of negative sequelae. However, lack of knowledge by providers and patients alike creates barriers to accessing and receiving evidence-based care, and may further delay diagnosis for patients, especially those who experience covert postpartum urinary retention. Nationally accepted definitions and management algorithms for postpartum urinary retention are lacking, and development of such guidelines is essential for both patient care and research design. We propose intrapartum recommendations and a standardized postpartum bladder management protocol that will improve patient outcomes and contribute to the growing body of evidence-based practice in this field.

Impact of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries on Postpartum Sexual Function: A Prospective Cohort Study.

IMPORTANCE: Sexual dysfunction, which is common in the postpartum period, often does not resolve by 6 months and is likely more severe in women with severe obstetric lacerations. OBJECTIVES: The aims are to describe sexual function at 6 months postpartum in women who experienced obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) and to compare sexual function between women with mild and severe OASI. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective cohort study of women with OASI. At 6 months postpartum, women were surveyed regarding sexual function using the Postpartum Pelvic Floor Birth Questionnaire, which compares current sexual function to sexual function before vaginal birth. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-one women were included. Eighty-one (53.6%) women had spontaneous vaginal delivery, and 70 (46.4%) had operative vaginal delivery. One hundred seventeen (77.5%) experienced a mild OASI, and 34 (22.5%) experienced a severe OASI. On the Postpartum Pelvic Floor Birth Questionnaire sexual activity domain, median score for all women was 2.6 (interquartile range, 2.1-3.0) with scores <3.0, indicating worse functioning. The sexual activity domain median scores were 2.4 (1.9-3.0) for mild OASI and 2.8 (2.6-3.0) for severe OASI ( P = 0.011), indicating worse scores for women with mild OASI. Within the sexual activity domain, women with mild OASI had worse median scores than women with severe OASI when reporting on enjoyment of sexual activity, frequency of intercourse, and enjoyment during sexual intercourse. CONCLUSIONS: Women who experience OASI have worse sexual function compared with predelivery. Discussion of sexual function is critical for postpartum women, especially for those who are at increased risk after experiencing OASI.

Outcomes of Pessary Use at 1 Year in Women Treated for Pelvic Organ Prolapse in a Large Multicenter Registry: Developed by the Pelvic Floor Disorders Registry.

IMPORTANCE: There is a lack of high-quality long-term follow-up regarding pessary treatment. Most studies are case series or retrospective with a small sample size and short-term follow-up. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate differences in women who continue versus discontinue pessary use and the effectiveness, quality of life, and safety associated with pessary management at 1 year. STUDY DESIGN: This study analyzed a multicenter national registry following women for 3 years with vaginal prolapse treated with a pessary or surgery. The primary outcome of this analysis was to compare the difference in characteristics among those who continue versus discontinue pessary use at 12 months. RESULTS: Among 1,153 participants enrolled, 376 (32.6%) opted for a pessary, and 296 (78.7%) were successfully fitted. Data were available for 240 participants (81%). At 1 year, 62% (n = 148) were still using pessaries, and 38% (n = 92) had stopped with 25% opting for surgery. Most commonly reported de novo adverse effects were urinary leakage (16%), feeling or seeing a bulge (12%), and vaginal discharge (11%). There was no difference in baseline characteristics among women who continued versus discontinued pessary use. At 12 months, subjective symptoms were similar between groups, with similar change in symptoms from baseline on most validated instruments. Those who continued to use a pessary reported worse urinary symptoms due to de novo urinary leakage ( P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: At 1 year, most women successfully fitted with a pessary continued pessary use. Although there was a significant improvement in condition-specific quality of life and low rates of complications, approximately 40% of women discontinued pessary use by 12 months. We were unable to identify any baseline characteristics associated with pessary discontinuation.

Protracted Postpartum Urinary Retention: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Natural History of a Rare Postpartum Urinary Retention Subtype.

IMPORTANCE: Postpartum urinary retention (PUR) is a multifactorial condition that requires a high degree of clinical suspicion for timely diagnosis and proper intervention. OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study are to describe PUR incidence and to compare natural history, obstetric characteristics, and associated risk factors for protracted PUR (extending ≥3 days postpartum) versus PUR. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study of women who underwent an obstetric delivery over 24 months at an academic institution. International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, codes were used to identify PUR. Patient characteristics, obstetric delivery data, and peripartum care surrounding delivery were collected. A P value of 0.05 or less was significant. RESULTS: Between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019, there were 23,844 deliveries (vaginal and cesarean section) and 77 patients (0.32%) experienced PUR. Within this group, 12 (0.05%) experienced protracted PUR. Patients with protracted PUR had a significantly later postpartum diagnosis day (median 1 [interquartile range, 1-2] vs 1 [0-1], P = 0.004), longer time to retention onset (22.0 [10.7-37.0] vs 10.7 [7.9-19.4] hours, P = 0.03), and greater retention duration (12.5 [5.5-17.0] vs 1.0 [0.0-1.0] days, P < 0.001) compared with those with PUR. There were no significant differences in patient or delivery characteristics for those delivering vaginally between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Protracted PUR is rare, occurring in 0.05% of deliveries. Women with protracted PUR were more likely to have a greater onset time, later diagnosis date, and longer retention duration, out to 47 days, compared with women with PUR resolution before postpartum day 3.

Postoperative pain and the need for intervention after sacrospinous ligament hysteropexy compared to colpopexy: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare postoperative pain between patients undergoing sacrospinous ligament colpopexy (SSLF) and hysteropexy (SSLH). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing native tissue SSLF and SSLH between January 2013 and March 2020. The electronic medical record was queried for demographic and perioperative data until the postoperative visit. The primary outcome was a composite incidence of any of the following: telephone calls, urgent office visits, additional analgesic prescriptions and need for intervention for pain in the buttocks, posterior thigh or perirectal area. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of persistent pain at the postoperative visit and perioperative risk factors associated with reported pain. RESULTS: A total of 406 patients met inclusion criteria (308 SSLF, 98 SSLH). The composite pain outcome was seen in 99 patients (24.4%; 95% CI 20.5%-28.8%), and there was no statistical difference between cohorts. Persistent pain was seen in 15.6% and 13.3% of SSLF and SSLH patients at 6 weeks (p = 0.58). Twelve patients (3.0%) underwent interventions for pain, including physical therapy (2), trigger point injections (5) and suture release (5). Compared to SSLF patients, SSLH patients were more likely to need interventions (7 [7.1%] vs. 5 [1.6%], p = 0.005) and office visits (14 [14.3%] vs. 13 [4.2%], p = 0.0005) for pain. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the overall incidence of postoperative pain between patients who underwent SSLF or SSLH. However, patients who underwent hysteropexy were more likely to need intervention and office evaluation for postoperative pain.

Determining the Ideal Intraoperative Resting Genital Hiatus Size-Balancing Surgical and Functional Outcomes.

IMPORTANCE: The intraoperative resting genital hiatus (GH) size can be surgically modified but its relationship to prolapse recurrence is unclear. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to identify the optimal intraoperative resting GH size as it relates to prolapse recurrence and functional outcomes at 1 year. STUDY DESIGN: This prospective cohort study was conducted at 2 hospitals from 2019 to 2021. Intraoperative measurements of the resting GH, perineal body, and total vaginal length were collected. The composite primary outcome consisted of anatomic recurrence, subjective recurrence, and/or conservative or surgical retreatment at 1 year. Comparisons of anatomic, functional, and sexual outcomes were compared between patients stratified by the optimal intraoperative GH size identified by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients (median age of 63 years) underwent surgery, with 59 (86.8%) presenting for follow-up at 1 year. Based on the 13 patients (22%) with composite recurrence, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated an intraoperative resting GH size of 3 cm, had 76.9% sensitivity (confidence interval [CI], 54-99.8%), and 34.8% specificity (CI, 21.0-48.5%) for composite recurrence at 1 year (area under curve = 0.61). Nineteen patients had an intraoperative GH less than 3 cm (32.2%) and 40 had a GH of 3 cm or greater (67.8%). The intraoperative resting GH size was significantly larger in patients with prolapse beyond the hymen at 1 year (4 cm [3.0, 4.0]) compared with those with prolapse at or proximal to the hymen (3.0 cm [2.5, 3.5], P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative GH size may not reliably predict composite prolapse recurrence at 1 year, although there was an association between intraoperative resting GH size with prolapse beyond the hymen.

Starting a peripartum pelvic floor disorder clinic: what to expect in the first thirty-six months.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Subspecialty peripartum pelvic floor disorder (PFD) clinics provide care to a unique patient population. We aim to describe the experiences of such a clinic in the first 36 months after its establishment. METHODS: This is a descriptive case series of all women who presented to a subspecialty PFD clinic at an academic medical center over 36 months (January 2018-December 2020). Patient characteristics, referral patterns, and care plans will be described. RESULTS: Four hundred eighty-three women presented for care. Women were a mean age of 31.0 ± 4.2 years, most were primiparous (404, 83.6%), and over half (279, 57.8%) had a spontaneous vaginal delivery. Three hundred eighteen women (66.9%) had obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI), which was also the primary referral indication in 313 (64.8%). Most consultations were from an obstetrician (246, 51.3%), and the median time from delivery to evaluation was 17 days (IQR 11.0-34.0). The majority of women had one additional follow-up visit (330, 68.3%). One hundred forty-one (29.9%) women underwent minor office procedures, and 26 (5.4%) underwent surgery. The number of referrals sequentially increased from year 1 (59, 12.2%) to year 3 (215, 44.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The 36-month experiences in our growing subspecialty peripartum PFD clinic demonstrate both sustainability and feasibility of this new service line, with consistent clinical growth over time and 483 new consultations, 2/3 of which were for OASI and the other 1/3 for a variety of peripartum pelvic floor indications. Our data outline a model for care, including timeline for follow-up, treatments administered, and number of interventions, both office and surgical.